A comparison of kantian philosophy and mills utilitarianism

Difference Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism refers to ethical ideas which uphold an action is ethicallycorrect if the results of that action tend to be more advantageous than unfavorable. The underlying idea behind Kantian ethics is that each human being has inherent worth and that human reason facilitates human autonomy.

We are capable of acting in a way that corresponds to our own desires; and we are, if we want, capable of shaping our desires.

Kantianism > Utilitarianism

The general law or rule, states that nobody can rest under any situation. There are several varieties of utilitarianism. Autonomy and ability to choose your moral projects: But does this satisfy us as a defence of punishment for the breaking of norms? Therefore, we should also have the ability to reason to the right behavior.

In his moral deliberation the agent can appeal to secondary principles, such as the prohibition of homicide, as an approximate solution for the estimated problem. The respective chapter in the System ofLogic he later claimed was the best part of the entire book.

According to Mill, our moral obligations result from the justified part of the moral code of our society; and the task of moral philosophy consists in bringing the moral code of a society in better accordance with the principle of utility. Mill answers the latter in the negative. If one finalizes an action based on their duty to execute, they are doing the right thing since it is what they feel they have to to do as their work.

Gradually, sympathy becomes more inclusive. The desire to change oneself resides, for Mill, in the individual, thus in our selves.

Ethics Theories: Utilitarianism Vs. Deontological Ethics

But as we have seen, this is not his view. Whewell claimed that utilitarianism permits murder and other crimes in particular circumstances and is therefore incompatible with our considered moral judgments.

That knowledge, virtue, wealth or fame is seen as intrinsically valuable is due to the operation of the principle of association.

In a famous letter to a Henry Jones, he clarifies that he did not mean that every person, in fact, strives for the general good. There are a great variety of lifestyles that are equally good. That an action tends to produce a particular consequence means that this consequence has a high probability.

But to treat it as a subjective end is to deny the choice of freedom in general.

John Stuart Mill: Ethics

In the light of these passages, it is not surprising that the question whether Mill is an act- or a rule-utilitarian has been intensely debated. Fatalism advocates a completely different thesis. Kantian moral theory values the universal law and maxims as its guide for how people should take action in a given situation.

This seems to be a surprising thing to say for a hedonist. The first points in an act utilitarian, the second in a rule utilitarian direction. Emily Wang October 31, at 9: I believe that every theory has loopholes.

It was not enough — seen in the light of his character and his perception of the situation — to discourage him from violating the norm. As we will see in Part Two, this notion is very difficult to justify if one abandons the theological doctrine of man being made in the image of God.

Tan and his family are residing, or you can admit that indeed — they are living with you. This way the seeming contradiction between the First and the Second Formula can be resolved. To Kant, the only good thing in the universe is good will. Kantian ethics bases the morality of a decision based off of whether or not the maxim could be a conceivable universal law of nature—which makes it seem heavily rule-based and strict.

Therefore, we should also have the ability to reason to the right behavior. To provide Christians worldwide with carefully researched information and well-reasoned answers that encourage them in their faith and equip them to intelligently represent it to people influenced by ideas and teachings that assault or undermine orthodox, biblical Christianity.

Utilitarianism demands us to drop all pursuits and pleasures in an attempt to maximize overall utility.Kantian Moral And Utilitarianism Ideas Philosophy Essay Ethics is the conscious reflection on our moral beliefs targeting to boost, lengthen or refine those values in some way.

Kantian moral and Utilitarianism ideas attempt to react to the ethical mother nature of human beings.

Kantian Moral And Utilitarianism Ideas Philosophy Essay

Kantianism vs Utilitarianism Those who are not students of philosophy, words like utilitarianism and Kantianism may sound alien, but for those who try to tackle questions of ethics and wisdom, these two represent important viewpoints. The primary difference between Kant’s deontology (the fancy name for his ethical theory) and utilitarianism, is that Kant viewed an action as right or wrong without respect to the consequences, whereas utilitarianism views an action as right or wrong only with reference to the consequences of the action.

May 30,  · For utilitarianism, you may use whatever means (act on whatever motives) are necessary to achieve an end that increases happiness. It doesn’t matter why you did the action, only that the end result is an increase in happiness. Because utilitarianism only cares that the end result is an increase in happiness and does not consider the intentions behind an action, I believe that Kantian ethics is a better moral law to follow when compared to utilitarianism.

John Stuart Mill: Ethics. The ethical theory of John Stuart Mill () is most extensively articulated in his classical text Utilitarianism (). Its goal is to justify the utilitarian principle as the foundation of morals.

This principle says actions are right in proportion .

A comparison of kantian philosophy and mills utilitarianism
Rated 0/5 based on 14 review